ios - How to set contraints for self sizing UITableViewCell using Auto Layout in Interface Builder -


i have self-sizing tableviewcell presents comments. if current user commented present edit , delete buttons. contraints work in case. of constraints set in interface builder.

the challenge when comment doesn't belong user set .ishidden = true both edit , delete buttons. how can adjust constraints new scenario?

enter image description here

edit: issue when set .ishidden true on buttons, want cell height shrink button space empty.

another approach:

toggle .isactive state of constraint bottom of buttons bottom of cell, along .ishidden state.

to so, add vertical space constraint bottom of date label bottom of cell, set >= 4 (or "padding" want when buttons not there).

add @iboutlet spacing constraint bottom of edit button bottom of cell. in image, shows bottom = edit button.bottom + 2. when ctrl+drag constraint ib source file generate iboutlet line this:

@iboutlet weak var editbuttonbottomconstraint: nslayoutconstraint!

you need edit line, though... constraints deallocated when deactivated, unless have "strong" reference it. so, remove weak modifier:

@iboutlet var editbuttonbottomconstraint: nslayoutconstraint!

now, in cellforrowat, can do:

    cell.deletebutton.ishidden = !(comment.userid == appuserid)     cell.editbutton.ishidden = !(comment.userid == appuserid)     cell.editbuttonbottomconstraint.isactive = (comment.userid == appuserid)

although, personally, make function inside cell.

based on cell design, though, i'm guessing commentslabel possibly / multi-line label? , you'll want cell expand vertically if comment is, say, 8 lines long? if so, still have few constraint relationships work out.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

python - Operations inside variables -

this question has answer here: evaluating mathematical expression in string 12 answers i want make python script finds maximum possible output using 2 operations. problem says there syntax error @ 2nd last line, in b in there. how can fix it? x = 0 = int(input("1st number:")) c = int(input("2nd number:" )) e = int(input("3rd number:" )) in range(4): if == 0: b = "+" elif == 1: b = "-" elif == 2: b = "/" else: b = "*" j in range(4): if j == 0: d = "+" elif j == 1: d = "-" elif j == 2: d = "/" else: d = "*" k = b c d e print(k) if you're after variables e on single line, couldn...
Read more

Generic Map Parameter java -

i having lot of methods of type: public static list<eduusers> getdetails(class c, map<string, integer> params) { list<eduusers> details = null; session session = hibernateutil.getsessionfactory().opensession(); transaction tx = null; try { tx = session.begintransaction(); criteria cr = session.createcriteria(c); (map.entry<string, integer> entry : params.entryset()) { cr.add(restrictions.eq(entry.getkey(), entry.getvalue())); } details = cr.list(); tx.commit(); } catch (exception asd) { log.debug(asd.getmessage()); if (tx != null) { tx.commit(); } } { session.close(); } return details; } i trying have generic method them , have written far: public static <t> list<t> getdetails(class<t> c, class<t> b) { l...
Read more

arrays - What causes a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and how do I prevent it? -

what arrayindexoutofboundsexception mean , how rid of it? here code sample triggers exception: string[] name = {"tom", "dick", "harry"}; for(int = 0; i<=name.length; i++) { system.out.print(name[i] +'\n'); } your first port of call should documentation explains reasonably clearly: thrown indicate array has been accessed illegal index. index either negative or greater or equal size of array. so example: int[] array = new int[5]; int boom = array[10]; // throws exception as how avoid it... um, don't that. careful array indexes. one problem people run thinking arrays 1-indexed, e.g. int[] array = new int[5]; // ... populate array here ... (int index = 1; index <= array.length; index++) { system.out.println(array[index]); } that miss out first element (index 0) , throw exception when index 5. valid indexes here 0-4 inclusive. correct, idiomatic for statement here be: for (int index = 0; index <...
Read more