omnet++ - Unable to compile the programs in omnet 5.1.1 and veins 4.6 -


i using veins multihop broadcasting. installed veins 4.6 , demo scenario working should. trying run code following link https://github.com/travlr/francisco3/tree/master/src/modules/application not compile , gives following errors

warning: opp_run: cannot check library ../../src/veins: specified >module not found   error: cannot load library '../../src//libveins.dll': specified module >could not found  end.  simulation terminated exit code: 1 working directory: c:/users/mu/veins-4.6/examples/veins command line: ../../../omnetpp-5.1.1/bin/opp_run.exe -m -n .;../../src/veins  -->image-path=../../images -l ../../src/veins omnetpp.ini  environment variables: path=;c:/users/mu/veins-4.6/src;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-  5.1.1\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\mingw64\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin;;c:/users/mu/omnetpp-5.1.1/ide/jre/bin/server;c:/users/mu/omnetpp-5.1.1/ide/jre/bin;c:/users/mu/omnetpp- 5.1.1/ide/jre/lib/amd64;.;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\mingw64\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\local\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin;c:\windows\system32;c:\windows;c:\windows\system32\wb>em;c:\windows\system32\windowspowershell\v1.0\;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin\site_perl;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin\vendor_perl;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\tools\win64\usr\bin\core_perl;c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1; omnetpp_root=c:/users/mu/omnetpp-5.1.1/ omnetpp_image_path=c:\users\mu\omnetpp-5.1.1\images

this code working fine in omnet 4.6 unable run in omnet 5.1. kindly please in resolving these errors.thanks in advance


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

python - Operations inside variables -

this question has answer here: evaluating mathematical expression in string 12 answers i want make python script finds maximum possible output using 2 operations. problem says there syntax error @ 2nd last line, in b in there. how can fix it? x = 0 = int(input("1st number:")) c = int(input("2nd number:" )) e = int(input("3rd number:" )) in range(4): if == 0: b = "+" elif == 1: b = "-" elif == 2: b = "/" else: b = "*" j in range(4): if j == 0: d = "+" elif j == 1: d = "-" elif j == 2: d = "/" else: d = "*" k = b c d e print(k) if you're after variables e on single line, couldn...
Read more

Generic Map Parameter java -

i having lot of methods of type: public static list<eduusers> getdetails(class c, map<string, integer> params) { list<eduusers> details = null; session session = hibernateutil.getsessionfactory().opensession(); transaction tx = null; try { tx = session.begintransaction(); criteria cr = session.createcriteria(c); (map.entry<string, integer> entry : params.entryset()) { cr.add(restrictions.eq(entry.getkey(), entry.getvalue())); } details = cr.list(); tx.commit(); } catch (exception asd) { log.debug(asd.getmessage()); if (tx != null) { tx.commit(); } } { session.close(); } return details; } i trying have generic method them , have written far: public static <t> list<t> getdetails(class<t> c, class<t> b) { l...
Read more

arrays - What causes a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and how do I prevent it? -

what arrayindexoutofboundsexception mean , how rid of it? here code sample triggers exception: string[] name = {"tom", "dick", "harry"}; for(int = 0; i<=name.length; i++) { system.out.print(name[i] +'\n'); } your first port of call should documentation explains reasonably clearly: thrown indicate array has been accessed illegal index. index either negative or greater or equal size of array. so example: int[] array = new int[5]; int boom = array[10]; // throws exception as how avoid it... um, don't that. careful array indexes. one problem people run thinking arrays 1-indexed, e.g. int[] array = new int[5]; // ... populate array here ... (int index = 1; index <= array.length; index++) { system.out.println(array[index]); } that miss out first element (index 0) , throw exception when index 5. valid indexes here 0-4 inclusive. correct, idiomatic for statement here be: for (int index = 0; index <...
Read more